St Stephan:
I'm glad you wanted me to interview you, Serenity, but I must tell you
I do it with some trepidation. The reason is - I think it's best to be
frank - there are some general doubts about you and your site. You may
remember a recent thread in the BEA complaining about the small, fuzzy,
often headless pics on the site, and generally questioning your authenticity.
I don't see any concrete reason to doubt you, but let's see if we can establish
a few things.
You are a very
pretty girl with huge tits, and although you're a heavy woman, that's the
price of being all natural, which is of course a huge plus. But I'd like
to see a little more of you. I can appreciate that you don't want to show
your face, but you must understand that that's a big minus for people who
want to see the whole woman. Why don't you show your face? Of course there's
an obvious answer to that, but I'd like to hear it from you.
Serenity:
Maybe I’d better give you a quick overview as to how this whole thing
started. I figured from that, you would be able to understand any controversy
about whether I am real or not.
Basically,
I was surfing, discovered Yahoo clubs, one in particular, Big 4inch Nipple
World. I was absolutely fascinated and decided as a lark to upload a photo.
Everything went from that point. I got such an incredible response that
I decided to start my own Yahoo club. I had about 6000 members in roughly
2 months.
For my own privacy
and because I am somewhat shy, I had my good friend and photographer shoot
only my breasts. Basically, my family would never understand this creative
side of me and I wasn't comfortable with my body. (I had recently lost
75 pounds). I think the controversy started when people would ask to see
my face and wanted larger images.
St Stephan:
I suppose you are now more comfortable with your body, after the favorable
reaction you’ve had from so many people. Many men (and women too, no doubt)
are nuts about your type, and although I don’t share their unbridled enthusiasm,
I do find you very nice to look at. I too would like to see your face,
especially since, from what I can see in pictures like this you're a really
pretty girl - inter alia, that devastating combination of blue eyes
and red hair (I hope the hair is natural: it seems to be the same in every
picture).
Serenity:
I am a genuine redhead. I have my hair done before each photo shoot and
we shoot about 12 different scenarios each time. I guess that's why my
hair looks the same. If you did see all the photos on the website you would
notice that I do have bad hair days.
.
I also have
one set of shots of me in the tub (I've attached one), in which my hair
is wet and tied in a ponytail. It looks almost black in the photos.
The fact is
by this time I had decided to start a website and felt that if people wanted
larger images, they could find them on my paysite. On my site, I show my
entire body except that I blur the bottom half of my face. I still value
my privacy. It is as simple as that.
St Stephan:
Right, I understand that - although I do wonder if your family and
friends wouldn’t recognize you from pictures like this, where your highly
unusual figure is combined with fairly distinguishable facial features.
Serenity:
I suppose if my family would come across my site they would be able to
tell it's me, but for right now, my privacy is the utmost importance to
me. I still do work outside of this field, so I need some sort of anonymity.
St Stephan:
I’ve never joined your site, but among the pictures I’ve seen there
are no clear body shots - well-lit shots showing your full body, e.g. standing,
lying down, front or rear view. an you send me a couple? I mean, it’s obvious
that you’re no sylph, so why not show that body, which your fans find so
appealing? And of course a lot of viewers would like to see you in the
altogether.
Serenity:
I definitely am more comfortable with my body, but not comfortable enough
to show it completely naked. I am not where I want to be weight wise yet,
and once I do reach my new set of goals, I'll reevaluate how I want to
show myself. For right now, however I will not be showing my face or my
body completely nude.
St Stephan:
Another obvious question: are your breasts totally natural, or enhanced
in any way? There's been quite a debate going on at the BEA as to whether
your breasts are real or enhanced, though the few that are arguing enhanced
are not making much headway. (For myself, I have no doubt that they're
real, as you say: the shape is natural and your general large size lends
credibility. I just have long experience as advocatus diaboli.)
You might also be willing to provide some statistics of interest: your
height and weight, their size and weight (I really must ask you
to weigh them honestly, everyone will want to know that).
Serenity:
My breasts are 100% natural. I started developing when I was about 12 or
13 and have been growing ever since. I am 5' 9" and a true lady never reveals
her weight.
My measurements
are 48" around the chest and 56" around the entire back and breast area.
I have been told by an online bra-maker that that equals a 48K cup. Initially
my original bra maker measured me as a 54F, thus the name Serenity54F.
It seems that the various companies have their own measurement scales.
I have weighed
each breast and the right one weighs 8.5 pounds and the left one is around
8.25. It was pretty tough getting an accurate reading as you can well imagine!
St Stephan:
Indeed I can, though it’s a feat I’ve never attempted myself. There still
remains the vital question: how can we know that you (the person I’m communicating
with right now) are really Serenity (the voluptuous woman I see in the
pictures)?
Serenity:
I tell you, I am so tired of this constant back and forth about whether
I am a real person or whether my breasts are real or fake. I wish people
would give me a break. But I guess I should be happy they are so interested.
If it would help establish my validity, I am willing to call you and have
a chat over the phone. I have also attached a larger size image that shows
my entire body, minus the lower half of my face. I hope this gives you
more of an idea about who I am.
St Stephan:
Thanks for the pic (actually, I already had it from your Yahoo site) but
that still doesn’t answer my question. Serenity, I hope I haven’t come
across as hostile to you. I’m not. I’m just being cautious. People can
claim to be anything they want on the Internet, and can show pictures they
claim are of them. I’m convinced the pictures of you are real, as are the
breasts portrayed in them, but I’m not 100% sure it’s you, Serenity,
and not, say, some former boyfriend who has a stock of pics and is putting
them up. See my problem?
I have no objection
to a phone chat with you, but - unless we had videophones or vidcams -
it wouldn’t prove anything except that there was some woman on the other
end of the line. But I have thought of a simple way you can show that you
are the person in the photos: have a photo taken of you posing according
to my specifications. I’m not asking for an entire custom photoshoot, just
one or two pics. What do you think? (You can always decline when I give
you the specifications - although they’ll be fairly vague, and nothing
hardcore or kinky. If you can’t see your way to this, never mind, we’ll
just go ahead with the interview.)
Serenity:
You haven't come across as hostile. I am happy to take this opportunity
to prove to everyone that I am real. I understand why though. On Yahoo
there are a few guys assuming female characters and stealing images of
the web to run their sites. It really ticks me off.
I am willing
to shoot a couple of pics to your specifications. However, I do have some
ground rules. No face and no full nudity. Let me know what you want me
to do.
St Stephan:
OK, I’ll give you two scenarios, take your pick:
Number 1 is
a Lara Croft type series, wearing ultra-short shorts, holsters with leg
straps, but no top, carrying a gun in each hand. Three pics (or
more) of you aiming at the camera, looking ready to do business: one front
shot, one side and one rear (or three-quarters rear), but in each case
you’re looking (and aiming) at the camera . If the dark glasses are not
enough concealment, you can wear some kind of mask. A possible costume
variant would be a Western outlaw motif with a bandanna mask, otherwise
the same poses (and please, really short shorts, or a bikini bottom will
do, but no top, remember?) If you wear a cowboy hat for this one, please
don’t conceal too much of your lovely hair.
Possibility
2 is a harem costume, very low cut below the navel, with the typical sheer
belly dancer’s skirt or baggy harem pants (sheer enough so that we can
see your legs): again, no top, please - or if you do a series, you can
start with the top but take it off. You could assume various dancing positions
with arms raised, once again at least one frontal, one side and one rear
or half-rear shot.
OK? I think
these are reasonable, and meet your requirements. Let me know if (and when)
you can manage them.
....[later]
Serenity:
Okay, the shoot is complete. I came as close as I could to what you wanted.
I hope they work for you. The shorts are the shortest I own. I also recently
changed my hairstyle, just to look different.
St Stephan:
Thanks, Serenity. That should put to rest any doubts about your existence
as the woman in the photos. (I've left my specifications as I wrote them,
so the readers can see you answered as a response to them: the three pics
are below.) Now, what about your professional career? Do you appear anywhere
as an entertainer, or confine the business side of your life to pictures
and videos? Do you have a more commonplace everyday job?
Serenity:
I have a separate career as a graphic designer (and now a web designer,
I designed the site). I have been in the publishing/print magazine industry
for about 10 years. My paysite, Yahoo and eGroups clubs are the only places
that I can be seen. I have also just completed my first video ever - as
participants in the BEA Forum are aware.
St Stephan:
Is your site doing good business?
Serenity:
My site is doing so well that my host had to transfer me to my own server
because of all the traffic. I am at close to 600 members in the couple
of months I have been up and running.
St Stephan:
Hey, 600 members at 20 bucks each makes...$12,000 a month, with minimal
outlay! Or am I calculating something wrong?
Serenity:
The site's revenue varies. I now have (as this interview has progressed)
many more members. I also have a contest to meet me if you join eMelons
for 6 months and I have a bunch of members who have done so. The $12,000
a month is not quite accurate and I would rather not give out specifics
on the financials of the site.
St Stephan:
Again your reticence is understandable. Still, your monthly expenses couldn't
be more that a couple of thousand, so it's easy to calculate that with
upwards of 600 members, you’re surely making more than ten grand a month!
I’m in the wrong sideline (I sell soiled underwear purloined from the neighboring
nunnery’s laundry, but I never net more than $400 a month: maybe I should
try e-bay.) OK, Serenity, it's been an informative chat. Just a couple
more incidental questions occur to me: first, how did you pick your professional
name (surely it's not your real name)? Are you endowed with a particularly
calm, serene personality? Are you perhaps into Asian philosophies and cultures?
Serenity:
Believe it or not Serenity is my given name. My mum is still somewhat of
a hippie into natural foods, meditation and all that. Actually she was
quite famous in London in her time. She did a bit of modeling and used
to hang out with some well known musicians. Anyway, it is a good name for
me, because I think I am serene most of the time. I definitely enjoy my
quiet and my space.
St Stephan:
Pax tecum et cum... hey, wait a minute: your mother was "quite famous
in London"? Are you English?
Serenity:
I am English, born in London. I came to the States when I was a lot younger.
I still have a bit of an English accent. My mother is English and my father
is Italian.
St Stephan:
By Jove! I
wager that will come as a surprise to many. Non Angla sed angela, quid?
Just a last
question: I remember you promising to put up some pics of the late (but
great) Joey Carson on your site. Was she a friend of yours, or was there
some other connection between you?
Serenity:
My photographer and business partner was the husband of the late Joey.
As I'm sure you know, she passed away about 2½ years ago. We are
currently creating a tribute web site to her that will be affiliated with
eMelons.
I did not know
Joey personally, only through her photographs and the words of her husband.
I know I would have liked her immensely. She was definitely my kind of
woman. Strong, independent, beautiful and a lady.
St Stephan:
I only know her as beautiful, since I only know her through her pictures,
but I'm glad to hear such good things about her.
So, that was
it: thank you very much for your time and trouble, Serenity, and good luck
with your site. |