S T   S T E P H A N  
BEA
TITUDES  
     
 
 
 
 

Am I going to make a proclamation In the Name of the Archive? No, I don't have the right. Who does? Owner. But Owner is legendary for his reticence. This is now my fourth article which calls for a reply from him (the need for a reply was in fact the whole point of my article "Mehr Licht!" in BEhavior v2n10), with never a public response (I did get a private response after sending him an e-mail). So we're usually left to figure things out on our own (which would be perfect if we had some way to implement them too). We do have available some of Owner's statements, as we will shortly see, and I found them pretty clear about the nature of the site. Let's say that if Owner doesn't reply to the following, it means that I'm right (heh-heh: clever, huh?)

No, my title refers to the words in the name of the Archive, words which are used to justify declarations like the following (direct quote, I just corrected minor typos):

Reality Check. This site isn't about big breasts.

It's about growing breasts and failing that, expanded breasts.

I'm not saying people don't want to see big breast pictures. I know I do. Only that this isn't the place for it.

For those who may argue that implanted breasts should count... Well, just how many breast implant stories are in the Story Archives? How many video clips are available of breast expansion surgery?

None. Why? Because it's not what the fantasy is about. This is the one real place on the web for growing and expanded breasts among hundreds featuring merely big boobs. Let's keep it that way.

That was posted in the UG Forum at the beginning of this month by...well, I'll postpone saying by whom, because it doesn't matter. This is most definitely not an ad hominem argument, and there have been quite a few other posts, or remarks in the Gallery, in the same vein.

Such declarations base themselves on the Name of the Archive: a typical remark is "After all, this is the Breast EXPANSION Archive, isn't it?" But we can't just look at the name, we have to look at the whole presentation of the Archive, which has evolved since its founding. In fact, it is on the introductory pages of the Archive where we can see some declarations by Owner -- or at least they must have his approval. Take a little tour with me.

When we enter the Archive, after agreeing to the disclaimer at www.bearchive.com, we arrive at this page, with three headings: Webmasters, Members, and Visitors. Under Webmasters we see:
If you'd like to create a big bust website or breast expansion website, visit our webmaster services page
The or which I have emphasized (emphasis is mine throughout) makes it clear that big busts are as welcome here as breast expansion (they are even mentioned first). Members gives no content information, but under Visitors, we see:
If you're a fan of big breasts and enjoy seeing them expand, take a look at our visitor services page
The and in the second is confusing -- does he mean "both...and..." or "and/or", which is what "and" often means? -- but everything becomes clear when we follow the indicated link to visitor services page, and we see:
Thanks for visiting the Breast Expansion Archive, your provider of the biggest breasts on the 'net....

If you're a fan of big breast sites, you've come to the right place.

Now that's pretty damn clear, isn't it?

Re-Reality Check: this site is about big breasts.

 
     
After all, we're in agreement on the basic principles  
 
OK, so the Archive is devoted to big breasts, including morphed big breasts. Am I embarking on an anti-morph crusade? Not at all. Morphs are specifically invited on the pages I've just cited, they do feature in the name of the Archive (even though, as I have just documented, this name is not accurate) and they are welcome as a subset of big breasts -- but other subsets are welcome too (I'll go over these categories in the next issue). There are, of course, unwelcome off-topic posts in the Gallery, not to mention downright nastiness (oh, I just mentioned it, sorry). But big-boob pics are not in this unwelcome category, any more than morphs are.

I have no doubt that the world's best morphers congregate at the BEA: the only one I want to single out here is Cheviot, about whose morphed clip "Amply 1" I raved last April in BEhavior (take a look here, if you're curious -- or if you haven't downloaded his clip, for goodness' sake follow that link and click on the screencap at the end of my review; or heck, skip my review and just go here and download Clip 1).

Cheviot's morph's are superb, and I would certainly like to see more of them. But I hope he will reconsider his words which I quoted from the UG Forum above. And I hope the other morphing enthusiasts who have expressed similar ideas in the forums and in the UG will also reconsider, and show tolerance of other tastes. By all means, morph and encourage your fellow morphers; but please: let's have no more taking the Name in vain as grounds for proclaiming that...

the Breast Expansion Archive is the exclusive province of morphers,

and

the BEA isn't a big-breast site.

Forgive the stutter that overcomes me in moments of stress, but:
 
Re-Re-Reality Check:
BEA isn't reserved for morphs,
and it is a big-breast site.

 
   
model: TRACI TOPPS   photo 1: ©1999 DANNI'S HARD DRIVE
scan 2: WHITESTARR   morph 1: GONZO